The CEFR Scale: What A1 to C2 Really Means for Language Learners
If you’ve studied one or several second languages, you’ve probably come across the terms A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2 to evaluate your language level. This scale of linguistic evaluation is called the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, or CEFR for short.
It’s become common practice to use the CEFR frame of reference to qualify second language proficiency, including oral expression and written French skills in the foreign language learning process. However, the widespread use of these terms, whether by students, employers, or schools, has diluted their meaning. As a result, understanding of the terms and their evaluation vary considerably.
The article explores what is meant by these terms as well as the advantages and disadvantages of using them in language courses and language tests.

Table of Contents
A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2: CEFR – What is it?
At its core, the CEFR offers a standardized way to describe and measure language proficiency. The framework divides proficiency into six levels: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2, each encompassing incremental language abilities. By understanding these levels, language learners can effectively set learning goals, select appropriate learning materials, and gauge their progress with precision.
Furthermore, understanding the CEFR’s impact on education, employment, and international mobility provides a competitive edge in today’s multilingual environment.
CEFR levels defined
The CEFR divides language proficiency into six levels: A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, and C2. Each level encompasses specific proficiency markers, allowing learners to understand their current language level and what is required to progress further.
It’s important to keep in mind that each level can also be broken down into percentiles. So, it’s possible for a learner to be a low-B1 or high-B1 as opposed on simply B1, or B2.. This said, most tests don’t make this differentiation, meaning that general understanding of the different levels tends to be too clear-cut.
Common misconceptions about the Common European framework of reference
While the CEFR is a valuable tool for learners, common misconceptions can hinder its effective use. One such misconception is the belief that proficiency can only be accurately assessed through formal examinations aligned with the CEFR.
In reality, the CEFR provides a flexible framework that allows for self-assessment and the recognition of informal learning experiences.
While the CEFR provides a clear framework for understanding language levels, language schools, coaches, universities, and others are not obligated to strictly adhere to those defined levels when offering language lessons. This is to say that a school can classify an A2 class as B1 if they want and there’s nothing to stop them.
Some may mistakenly assume that reaching a higher CEFR level guarantees complete fluency or mastery of a language when, in fact, acquisition is a continual process that extends beyond the boundaries of specific proficiency levels.
Language certifications and Common European framework of reference
Many tests and certification, such as the DELF/DALF for French, the Goethe-Zertifikat for German, and the Cambridge English exams, align their test categories and passing grades with the CEFR levels and taxonomies. This alignment ensures that these certifications are internationally understood.
Certifications like DELF/DALF assess both spoken and written French language proficiency, emphasizing the importance of written skills for professional and technical communication.
Tests – Theory vs. Practice
It’s essential to keep in mind that examining bodies don’t have to answer to the creators of the CEFR in order to use their evaluation grid. If they want, they can set the bar of C1 at a high B2 level or a C2 at a high B2.
Test results reflect the vision of the test creator and not the that of the CEFR.
The standardized frame for referring to the language doesn’t ensure a standard for testing. There are many tests, a few of which are internationally recognized. Testing methods vary considerably, and results may differ significantly from one test to another.
The same can be said of language courses. It isn’t uncommon for language schools to label a A2 course as a B2 course. This is a great way for them to make their students think their progressing and recommend the school.
Self-assessment:
CEFR provides a self-assessment grid that can be used to self-assess your current level. They offer the self-assessment grid in 32 languages.
There’s quite a disparity between the official outline of the linguistic levels on the global scale of the CEFR website vs. the language self-assessment on the same CEFR website.
Why some people may never progress to C1 or C2
How long does it take to improve?
Currently, there is no universal agreement on how long it takes to improve one’s language level.This depends on factors such as student motivation, environment, the teaching method, the teacher, and the student. It also depends on what you mean by improve and what metrics are used.
From our experience, the average student can learn French, improving from a pre-A1 to a low A2 level in approximately 40 hours. This is for a student who can read and write the Latin alphabet. If they are unfamiliar with the Latin alphabet, it is still possible to improve spoken listening comprehension in those times, but writing and reading will take longer.
Time not quantity
Learning a language takes time. And no matter the study’s intensity, it’s impossible to circumvent the natural cognitive process. Some schools sell the idea of fluency in 100 hours, achieved over a 3-week course. While you might progress, reaching the level takes time.
You could progress from a 0 Level to a lower B1 level in 100 hours. However, this needs to be done over multiple months. How fast you progress is also a question of your environment.
Progressing from one level to the next takes time and personal time commitment. Progressing from an A1 to an A2 will be relatively fast compared to progressing from an A2 to a B1.
The reason is that language learning is not linear. When you know little or nothing of the language, acquiring the basic vocabulary and sentence structures to communicate on simple daily subjects is quite a jump and can be done relatively quickly.
However, progressing from a basic understanding and use of the language, A2, to an intermediate level of conversation, B1, where you can hold simple conversations with native speakers, requires much more effort.
This isn’t simply a question of learning lists of words or understanding the theory of the language (grammar), but rather, it’s a question of innate fluency and acquisition.
The following estimation is based on our teaching method and level metrics.
- 0 to low A2: 40 / 60 hours study – (2 to 3 months + basic use of the language outside class)
- A2-B1: 50/70 Hours Study (2 to 3 months + regular use of language outside class)
- B1-B2: 100/150 hours (2 to 3 months + regular use of language outside class)
Common European framework of reference: Navigating Language Proficiency and Myths
The CEFR delineates the progression from basic linguistic skills to advanced fluency, offering a structured framework for learners to understand their current proficiency and chart their language learning journey. Yet, misconceptions exist regarding the strict assessment tied to formal examinations aligned with the CEFR, ignoring the flexibility it offers for self-assessment and informal learning experiences.
Language certifications often align with CEFR levels, providing internationally recognized benchmarks. However, discrepancies in testing methods and varying standards among institutions highlight the need for cautious interpretation of test results.
Attaining higher CEFR levels, particularly C1 and C2, demands not just formal study but continuous immersion and exposure to the language in various contexts. Mastery at these advanced levels goes beyond mere linguistic competence, delving into nuanced expressions, implicit meanings, and specialized language domains.
Furthermore, the timeframe for improvement varies widely based on numerous factors, including motivation, learning environment, teaching methods, and individual capabilities. While certain estimations suggest progression within specific hour brackets, achieving fluency demands sustained effort, consistent practice, and immersion over an extended period.
Navigating language learning through the CEFR involves not only understanding the defined proficiency levels but also recognizing the dynamic nature of language acquisition. Embracing this understanding enables learners to set realistic expectations, choose appropriate learning approaches, and appreciate the continuous journey of mastering a new language.
The author:
My Linguistics specializes in creating language acquisition methods for teachers and students. Our Swiss-based training center serves as a testing ground for our method.
We’re passionate about helping people unlock the power of language and communication, and we’re committed to providing the resources and support needed to achieve fluency.
Contact us to learn more about our approach and method.